Monday, July 25, 2011

Good article

I found this article on BERSIH v2.0 (forwarded from a friend in the UK) very factual, balanced and insightful.
If you love Malaysia, love the truth and hate dirty politics, please forward this article to all your friends.


Bersih 2.0 Exposed – Bersih Is Politics

The Bersih 2.0 rally on the 9th July 2011 caught the attention of our political leaders as well as the international media.
I am fortunate to be working overseas for the last 10 years. I do love Malaysia and look forward to come back once I have completed my career goals. As a proud citizen of Malaysia, I would like to provide an independent assessment and inject some rational thinking on the current situation.

Many Malaysians who joined the rally on the 9th July 2011 have witnessed the level of unity in rallying for the same cause, i.e a fair elections for the country. There has not been one event in Malaysia for some time that has rallied so much support to fight for one cause.

Whether it is planned or unplanned, the NGOs and the organizers have rallied support from the political leaders (mainly opposition) to catapult this rally to a different level. While the objectives of the rally were apparently focused purely on electoral reform, most Malaysians surely would recognise that the Bersih rally has become – whether rightly or wrongly – political in nature, much like the protest rallies which took place during the Reformasi days of Anwar Ibrahim in 1997. The logic and rationale behind getting 20,000 – 50,000 people to show up on the streets remains a mystery despite the existence of various open and civilized channels. Even more interestingly, the leader of Bersih 2.0, Datuk Ambiga, was granted an audience with the King several days before the date of the rally, which was ostensibly called so that Bersih 2.0 can hand over a memorandum to the King!

However you look at the Bersih 2.0, one has to give all credit to the organizers for orchestrating a successful event / rally, especially in terms of impacting the thinking of the mass population of Malaysians.

On that note, I think there are generally two groups in this country. The first group is the silent majority (i.e those who prefers to stay home and be with their families in the wake of a rally). This group probably constitutes 80% of our population. Most of the time, they are happy to lead their own lives, and are mostly happy with the way things are in Malaysia. There are probably one or two things they aren’t too happy with, but nothing that would spur them to complain to the newspapers or in the blogs.

The second group is what I consider to be the loud minority. These are folks who are perpetually unhappy over the way things are in our fair country. Maybe they don’t like certain policies which have been put in place (and which have likely contributed in some way or other to the current prosperity and success of our country!) In any case, these are the ones who usually speak (and sometimes scream) the loudest on blogs and Youtube, injecting truth and lies and using emotional or racial sentiments to make their point.

While I respect the right of the 20,000 – 50,000 people that attended the Bersih 2.0 rally to demonstrate peacefully, I feel that they were mostly taken for a ride by the loud minority.

If one were to interview the people on the street who came to the rally on the 9th of July 2011 and ask them the question “What are you fighting for today, sir?”, I can guarantee many of them are not able to answer accurately. The majority of those who turned up on the streets are rempits, pakcik tua on the street, people from the village and some unfortunate urban poor people who were given false hope that rallying alone can somehow change the country.

While many Facebook supporters have “liked” Bersih 2.0 before the rally, you can see only a handful of professionals, private sector people, gathered on the street on the actual day.

What you will hear generally are various answers such as “Walk of democracy”, “We want fair democracy”, “We hate the Government”, “Say no to Corruption”, “Reformasi”, “Allahuakbar”, etc.

From here, you can witness inconsistencies of understanding among those who claim to support Bersih 2.0. This is not surprising, since the Bersih 2.0 organizers are rallying a vast number of different groups (NGOs as well as politically-motivated groups) to support one cause. Hence, the understanding and true intention of Bersih 2.0 was “simplified” to ignite more fire and encourage a herd mentality amongst the people.

The problem with the whole Bersih 2.0 campaign is that people forget to really look at the 8 points that the Bersih proponents are pursuing. Most of the people in the street rally don’t even have a clue about any or all of the 8 points and the argument for and against each of them. The whole thing has evolved into a war of perception which is based on a simplistic divide:

(A) If you support Bersih, then you reject corruption and embrace democracy and you are righteous

(B) If you reject Bersih, then you are dirty, corrupt, anti democracy and wicked

Given this war of perception, it is clear that (A) will win over (B) in terms of popular public support. The opposition joined in on (A) and the Government and the EC, including Barisan Nasional is demonized.
When I watched the Youtube videos on Bersih 2.0, the organizers were being very rhetorical about the rally, and why Malaysians should attend the rally. Because Bersih 2.0 has now “transformed” from the original 8 demands into the subject of “Cops are bad, look at this country”, most Malaysians are now fuelled with anger. Nonchalantly, the 8 demands has now been quietly swept aside without any discussion or debate or clear explanation from the present Government.

That is why I would like to return to the original point of Bersih 2.0: the 8-point demands for electoral reform from Bersih 2.0. Let us, Malaysians, return back to the subject. The 8-point demand.

I hope my independent assessment on the 8 demands by BERSIH v2.0 will inject some rational thinking and perspective so that all Malaysians can appreciate the context and content rather than marching on the streets aimlessly without any clear objective or reason.

Lets now look at the 8 demands raised by Bersih and subject them to scrutiny:

1. Clean the electoral roll

The electoral roll is marred with irregularities such as deceased persons and multiple persons registered under a single address or non-existent addresses. The electoral roll must be revised and updated to wipe out these ‘phantom voters’. The rakyat have a right to an electoral roll that is an accurate reflection of the voting population.

In the longer term, BERSIH 2.0 also calls for the EC to implement an automated voter registration system upon eligibility to reduce irregularities.

Based on the CIA World Fact book, death in Malaysia is 4.93 per 1,000 population (based on July 2011). Through extrapolation, for 28 million population, the estimated number of deaths in a year is 138,040 persons. Assuming the information is not updated in JPN over a period of 5 years, on a worst case scenario, the total “un-updated record of deceased persons” is 690,020 people.

According to the EC, we have 11.4 million registered voters. Assuming EC did not update their database due deceased people, this represent 6% inaccuracy of the true / actual registered voters.

Malaysians should ask: can a 6% “inaccuracy / irregularity” (on a worst case scenario) be a strong point to bash the EC or the Government for being unfair? I think this is absurd and politically motivated.

The fact that the opposition won more states in the next GE showed that fair election / democracy is in place.

Therefore, my question for those who are politically inclined: does the 6% translate into a sure win for the the political parties (including opposition) in the next GE?

For automatic voter registration as proposed by Bersih v2.0, many people have expressed disagreement on this subject.

There is a writer who posted something in Malaysian Insider that I would like to share…
“Not that I have anything against people registering to vote. I am a registered voter myself. However, to force something on someone — be it religion, racism and even voter registration — is something I just can’t agree with. It’s against a person’s free will. I see it as similar to parents determining their kids’ religions at birth; performing circumcision on a kid who doesn’t know any better; or even how parents of a male child with no penis would show off their kid in a photo opportunity for the Malaysian media, as we saw in 2009. There are many fears in having an automatic-registration system, primarily on the basis of privacy.”

As for voters registered with a non-existent addresses, everyone knows that we move from one place to another as we grow. Let’s assume that Ali was born in Kuala Lipis. He has an IC which has the address of his family in Kuala Lipis. 20 years later he migrated to Kuala Lumpur, then 5 years later he was posted to Terengganu for offshore assignment with Murphy Oil. 6 years later he was posted to lead a project in Sarawak. Does it mean he has to update his IC address and inform EC every time he moves to another address?

If let’s say 10 million of our population is affected by this, do you think it is practical to enforce it in reality my dear fellow Malaysians?

In short, Bersih’s demand of the automatic voters registration basically forces people to be registered. And that cannot be seen as democracy!

It definite contradicts Bersih’s principles of having a fair democracy.

2. Reform postal ballot

The current postal ballot system must be reformed to ensure that all citizens of Malaysia are able to exercise their right to vote. Postal ballot should not only be open for all Malaysian citizens living abroad, but also for those within the country who cannot be physically present in their voting constituency on polling day. Police, military and civil servants too must vote normally like other voters if not on duty on polling day.

The postal ballot system must be transparent. Party agents should be allowed to monitor the entire process of postal voting.

According to the Government website, Malaysia has approximately 1.2 million civil servants. The police & military are consistently on duty and geographically dispersed throughout the country. In fact, they are on duty too during elections, etc.

If the police, military are forced to vote normally, then they are forced to leave their duty in various locations. Imagine leaving the jungle, strategic border locations just to vote. I think this is not practical at all.

On this note, Bersih 2.0 also made a proposal to EC for party agents to monitor the entire process of postal voting. Well, this has not happened in any other countries. Please name me one country which allows parties on both divide to “intervene” in the EC processes or postal voting.

Also, postal voting happens not only for police and military personnel who are on duty, but also Malaysians who vote overseas. If Bersih 2.0 wants party agents to be allowed to monitor the entire process of postal voting, does that mean that party agents need to be posted whenever and wherever there are Malaysians voting overseas? (I’m sure some of them don’t mind having the excuse to have a nice holiday overseas, “in the name of democracy”!)

I think this proposal suggests deep paranoia and mistrust of key institutions in the country, including the Elections Commission (SPR), which I think is simply pathetic.

In conclusion, there has not been any real issues in terms of postal voting, whether in Malaysia or in other countries. After all, from a bigger picture perspective, the impact of postal votes is small compared to the actual votes in the various constituencies.

As a citizen who support fair elections in this country, I suggest that we should be focusing on the actual voting mechanism at the various constituencies rather than debating day and night on postal voting, which, in reality, produces a minimal impact to the election results.

For those who are politically inclined to dwell on the numbers and think that this is still not fair because the postal votes can ensure a better win, imagine this: Assuming 100% of the 1.2 million servants are forced to do postal voting, that represent 10% of the 11.4 million registered voters in this country. Assuming ceteris paribus, if you divide 11.4 million registered voters by 222 constituencies, that is 51,351 votes for each constituency. Therefore the postal votes (i.e 10% of 11.4m) constitute 5,400 votes vs. 51,351 votes.

With all the anger and insult which I hear from the political leaders and Bersih organizers, my conclusion is simple. The impact of postal voting to the overall result is minimal.

The majority swing or “success” for each political party is based on the actual voters who attend, register and vote on the actual election day. Surely as Malaysians, we shouldn’t be so easily fuelled and vortexed into something so small until we lose our logical reasoning.

I ask again the question to my dear fellow Malaysians. Looking at the maths, is this something worth fighting for? Is this what we call unfair election or democracy by the opposition?

3. Use of indelible ink

Indelible ink must be used in all elections. It is a simple, affordable and effective solution in preventing voter fraud. In 2007, the EC decided to implement the use of indelible ink. However, in the final days leading up to the 12th General Elections, the EC decided to withdraw the use of indelible ink citing legal reasons and rumours of sabotage.

Bersih 2.0 demands for indelible ink to be used for all the upcoming elections. Failure to do so will lead to the inevitable conclusion that there is an intention to allow voter fraud.

Less than 20 countries out of 194 countries use inedible ink in their elections. Indelible ink is NOT used by developed countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Hong Kong, Singapore, France, Japan and many others. It is used mainly in less developed countries with large populations.

Some of the countries include Afghanistan, Benin, Burkina Faso, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt, Gambia, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Lebanon, Mauritania, Peru, Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Suriname, Tchad, Uganda, and Zimbabwe.

It is also worth to note that indelible ink is not a fool-proof method and has its disadvantages such as:
· Indelible ink itself can be used to commit electoral fraud by marking opponent party members before they have the chance to cast their votes; and
· There have been cases in Afghanistan where “indelible” ink have washed off voters’ fingers using bleach; such ink was blamed for contributing to fraud in the first Afghan presidential election in 2005.

In short, if Malaysia decides to use indelible ink, for a country that has a comprehensive database and biometric identification of its citizens, it can be viewed as step backwards for the nation and not a step forward. Remember, less than 20 countries out of 194 countries uses indelible ink in their general elections.

For those countries who don’t use inedible ink, do you regard them as corrupt?
Bersih organizers have really managed to divert the attention of the public on this. Pure deception

4. Minimum 21 days campaign period

The EC should stipulate a campaign period of not less than 21 days. A longer campaign period would allow voters more time to gather information and deliberate on their choices. It will also allow candidates more time to disseminate information to rural areas. The first national elections in 1955 under the British Colonial Government had a campaign period of 42 days but the campaign period for 12th GE in 2008 was a mere 8 days.

There is no standard or best practice in any countries to determine the optimum campaign period. For example, Singapore has a 9-day campaign period, the United Kingdom has 17 days and Philippines has a 90-day campaign period. The misconception by the public at large is that the campaign period (whether it is 5 days, 21 days, 40 days, 60 days or even 100 days) guarantees a fair election.

Campaign activities must be viewed as an on-going activity by the ruling and opposition parties and not a one-off activity due to General Election. Both parties must work hard daily or throughout the year to ensure support from grass roots and voters at their respective constituencies. The all year round consistent campaigning throughout each constituency guarantees better results than a one-off GE campaign approach. This is particularly true in the modern world’s 24-hour news cycle, where politicians constantly jostle for media and public attention.

I feel that regardless the campaign period, both parties are not privy to the actual General Election dates (while it is true that in Malaysia, the incumbent Prime Minister has the upper hand due to his constitutional role in advising the Agong regarding the dissolution of Parliament, we know that even ruling party politicians play constant guessing games regarding the exact timing of polls). Hence, it is in the interest of both parties (ruling and opposition) to identify winnable candidates and strengthening their grassroots support through regular campaigning. I believe both sides are working equally hard at the grass root level to gain support.

In short, Bersih organizers and supporters should not view the campaign period as a key determining factor to ensure fair elections. Again, they have deceived the public and caused unnecessary anger.

5. Free and fair access to media

It is no secret that the Malaysian mainstream media fails to practice proportionate, fair and objective reporting for political parties of all divide. Bersih 2.0 calls on the EC to press for all media agencies, especially state-funded media agencies such as Radio and Television Malaysia (RTM) and Bernama to allocate proportionate and objective coverage for all political parties.

I feel this is a lob-sided request by Bersih 2.0. Free and fair access to media has been a hot topic of debate since Tun Mahathir’s time. At the same time, we are aware of the existence of alternative media which provide differing views which are sometimes being perceived as unfairly critical of one side or the other.
Lets look at some facts.

According to ITU (United Nation specialized agency for ICT), Malaysia has 17 million internet users in 2010. According to Nielsen research in 2010, newspaper in Malaysia has approximately 15 million readership (54% of population).

Malaysiakini recorded 1 million visitor in January 2011. For one year, it is estimated the total visitor is around 12 million people. And remember, we have other online news portal such as Malaysia Insider, Malaysia Reserve, etc.

On another data by Malaysian Digital Association (MDA) in April 2011, Malaysiakini recorded higher number of unique visitors at 2.7 million compared to the Star online at 2.4 million.

Therefore, if you compare the mainstream news vis-à-vis the alternative / online media, the equal number of visitors/ readers for both shows equal playing field if you want to view it politically. Why Bersih is making a big fuss out of this ?

Another strong point to note is that the Government does not ban or censor Malaysiakini, Malaysian Insider or any other internet portals must be viewed as a significant step compared to other countries. Despite much provocation from opposition-leaning portals, the Malaysian government has kept to its commitment of free and open Internet since the launching of the Multimedia Super Corridor, and I think the Government deserves a bit more credit for not emulating China in this regard.

In recent times, we have seen the birth of “invisible & anonymous online cybertroopers” whose job is to consistently post negative comments on any article that appear in various Internet portals.

Whilst we all know that these are either planned or posted by a small handful of individuals, we have not witnessed any censorship from the Government on the strings of unintelligent and provocative postings, including comments relating and blaming everything on the present Government.

The silent majority knows that most of the comments posted online at Malaysia Kini and Malaysia Insider are fabricated / scripted by certain quarters. Postings / ramblings such as “Hidup Pakatan”, “Wait for the next GE”, “Lets vote PR”, “Government bodoh”, etc are “recycled” and appeared in different articles.

If we want to scrutinize further, Malaysiakini and Malaysian Insider journalists have the tendency to post a negative title to capture the attention of the readers/ visitors. This makes certain quarters feel that the online-media are pro opposition.

So to sum it all, both political parties have equal playing field judging from the number of readers/visitors for both mainstream and alternative media. To allow fair reporting for all political parties, my view is that Bersih 2.0 must also call for the EC to ensure that online media such as Malaysiakini and Malaysian Insider practice proportionate, fair and balanced reporting.

6. Strengthen public institutions

Public institutions must act independently and impartially in upholding the rule of law and democracy. Public institutions such as the Judiciary, Attorney-General, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency (MACC), Police and the EC must be reformed to act independently, uphold laws and protect human rights. In particular, the EC must perform its constitutional duty to act independently and impartially so as to enjoy public confidence. The EC cannot continue to claim that they have no power to act, as the law provides for sufficient powers to institute a credible electoral system.

I fail to comprehend how Bersih 2.0 can make this call for “reform” of the institutions mentioned, when the Government has been doing precisely this for several years now, beginning with the Royal Commission to Enhance the Operation and Management of the Royal Malaysian Police, the establishment of the Judicial Appointments Commission, as well as the establishment of the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission.

In other words, the transformation of various national institutions is an ongoing process. And so, rather than continuing to lambast and ridicule vital institutions of the state such as the MACC and the police, I suggest that the Opposition and their friends in Bersih 2.0 should start being more productive and suggest concrete measures to transform our institutions for the better.

This is especially true for the Elections Commission. Other than continued calls from the Opposition for the EC to “report to Parliament” (what does that mean, anyway? Who is Parliament should they report to? How would reporting to a committee made up of squabbling politicians be any improvement from the current way that the EC is established?), we have not heard any specific and concrete measures to improve the EC.

Stop hiding behind vague rhetorical statements, and try to be more specific and concrete about what changes you propose to make.

7. Stop corruption

Corruption is a disease that has infected every aspect of Malaysian life. BERSIH 2.0 and the rakyat demand for an end to all forms of corruption. Current efforts to eradicate corruption are mere tokens to appease public grouses. We demand that serious action is taken against ALL allegations of corruption, including vote buying.

I agree and support Bersih 2.0’s call for war on Corruption. I am totally behind this as no one likes or condones corrupt practices in this country.

It took me several days to study this in greater depth and looking at what the present Government is doing vis-à-vis other countries. I am very passionate to share my findings with my fellow Malaysians who are there in KL raving about corruption.

My view can be simplified as follow.
Fighting corruption is an on-going battle, and I believe each country have to come up with preventive measures to curb corruption. When I looked at developed countries like Hong Kong, Singapore and the United States, it took them more than 10 years to fight corruption to a level where it is acceptable by global standards.

One of my ex-colleague is in a top 3 global investment bank and she had the opportunity to sit in to listen to the Government Transformation Programme (GTP as popularly known in Malaysia) update during an analyst roadshow in Singapore and Hong Kong. From her discussion with many other analyst, Malaysia has placed a number of significant game changer initiatives to prevent corruption and this is clearly reflect in the GTP annual report (which I’m told can be downloaded for free).

As this most hotly debated topic in Malaysia, I did some research on the web to get a better understand on what she meant by “significant game changer initiatives”.

For the first time, a Whistle Blower Act has been gazetted and now every Malaysians can submit a case and his/her identity will be protected. This is something new for all of us in Malaysia.
Next was the announcement of 18 corruption courts expedite corruption cases so that swift action can be taken. I think this is a brilliant idea! Not many countries have this.

From the MACC website, I found out more than 800 people have been arrested for corruption in 2010 alone. And 200 + confirmed cases have been published on the MACC website with names, IC number and photographs. This is indeed a significant milestones for this country if you ask me. I think we are following closely the Hong Kong model. For the record, ICAC of Hong Kong do publish the statistics of the convicted cases on their website.

I also managed to check how transparent the Government is in publishing the government award contracts, I have found this website called MyProcurement. Quite rough but it fits the purpose of listing more than 3,000 government award contracts. Not bad if you think about it.
Overall, although more can be said about Malaysia’s effort in fighting corruption, I feel Malaysia in the recent time has made leaps and bounds to build preventive measures.
At the end of the day, the corruption case may not reduce to zero overnight, but as a Malaysian, we have to give some credit on MACC’s effort.

Coming back to Bersih 2.0. Yes, I do support this demand/request by them. In fact, Bersih should work with the Government to bring the corruption cases along with the evidence forward as they have 18 corruption courts to expedite the matter. Anyone can make vague and unsubstantiated claims about corruption. Why Bersih 2.0 did not bring forward actual corrupt cases and work with MACC or EC remains unclear.

So Bersih should stop riding on this demand knowing the fact that Malaysia is doing everything they possibly can to fight corruption. In fact, stop being rhetoric about such pronouncement of intent. Rather, please work with MACC and bring solid corruption cases ! The public at large are sick of talk and debating about rhetoric stuff and all we need is to bring more corruption cases forward!

8. Stop dirty politics

Malaysians are tired of dirty politics that has been the main feature of the Malaysian political arena. We demand for all political parties and politicians to put an end to gutter politics. As citizens and voters, we are not interested in gutter politics; we are interested in policies that affect the nation.

If there is one demand from Bersih 2.0 that I like, then this will be it. We must stop dirty politics on both sides.

Politics in Malaysia is still at infancy stage. Fact based argument is often twisted to inject doubt in the society. Racial sentiments are always played to spark racial divide. Personal allegation and remarks between political leaders are often chosen as the best method as opposed to fact based arguments or healthy intellectual debate.

If you look in the last 10 years, the existence of a digital community has changed the landscape on how we think and altered our perception on they how we view a particular subject. More predominantly when everyone can express themselves through a combination of facts, fiction, lies and emotions on the web (i.e blogs, online media), then things start to change. This is coupled with the existence of “invisible cyber troopers” (from both sides) starting to post comments on negative things about this country.

Slowly but surely most of us in Malaysia are now blaming the Government’s education system for our kids’ lack of achievement despite given scholarship, good residential schools, etc. We blame the Government for the high cost of living despite having the lowest interest rate for car loans, property loans, etc. We blame the Government for not giving the rakyat enough subsidy despite being one of the most highly subsidized countries in the world. We blame the Government for not having sufficient investors into the country despite our Bursa Malaysia reaching 6 times record high in 2011 alone, etc.
I hope we do not come to a stage where we blame the Government for climate change too.

On the statement by Bersih 2.0 on “ we are interested in policies that affect the nation”, I managed to do a quick research about the Government Transformation Programme and the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) that the Najib administration talked about. After hours of research and reading, I almost fainted to count the number of articles and report from financial analyst/economists around the world on the national transformation agenda. Whether it has impact or not, one thing for sure the stock market in Malaysia has record high at 1580 points in 2011. That excludes that the fact the our stock Market has reach at least 5 times record high in 6 months of 2011 !

I mean, on one hand we demand “policies that affect the nation”, one one hand we forgot about the very achievements which are taking place infront of our eyes.

Dear fellow Malaysians, reading and observing how we act as a country, for a homogenous society, we need to embrace and forgive our differences.

We should be grateful. Malaysia is blessed with so many positive things surrounding us vis-à-vis our neighbouring country.

Each of us have a role to play.

Rallying and street demonstration doesn’t guarantee a better future.

Let’s stop the bickering and dirty politics.

Let’s focus on building this country together.

Friday, April 9, 2010

Melayu dikhianati?
oleh Awang Selamat

Arkib 31 Mei 2009, Utusan Malaysia Online

Hati Awang semakin hari semakin ditoreh-toreh oleh tuntutan pelbagai pihak bukan Melayu yang bersikap terlalu rasis selepas Pilihan Raya Umum ke-12. Kita boleh tafsir apa sebabnya. Awang tidak mahu mengulas panjang kali ini, cukup sekadar disiarkan semula petikan kenyataan seorang pemimpin MCA, Tun Tan Siew Sin pada 30 April 1969 (dipetik daripada buku Khalid Awang Osman dan pernah diulas Ridhuan Tee Abdullah) untuk renungan kita semua.

''Orang Melayu menerusi UMNO bermurah hati melonggarkan syarat-syarat dalam undang-undang negara ini sehinggakan dalam masa 12 bulan selepas kemerdekaan, 90 peratus penduduk bukan Melayu menjadi warganegara. Ini berbeza dengan keadaan sebelum merdeka di mana 90 peratus daripada mereka masih tidak diiktiraf sebagai rakyat Tanah Melayu walaupun hampir 100 tahun hidup di bawah pemerintahan penjajah. Sebagai membalas kemurahan hati orang Melayu, MCA dan MIC bersetuju meneruskan dasar memelihara dan menghormati kedudukan istimewa orang Melayu dan dalam masa yang sama mempertahankan kepentingan-kepentingan sah kaum lain''.

Sebelum itu, seorang pemimpin MIC Tun V.T Sambanthan pada 1 Jun 1965 pernah berkata: ''Pada tahun 1955 kita telah memenangi pilihan raya dengan majoriti yang tinggi, selanjutnya mendapat kemerdekaan dalam masa dua tahun kemudian. Dalam jangka masa itu, kita terpaksa berbincang dan menangani pelbagai perkara termasuk soal kewarganegaraan. Persoalannya di sini, apakah yang dilakukan oleh orang Melayu memandangkan kita bercakap menyentuh perkauman? Apakah yang dilakukan oleh pemimpin-pemimpin Melayu? Mereka mempunyai 88 peratus daripada pengundi menyokong mereka.

Apakah yang mereka putuskan mengenai isu kewarganegaraan? ''Jika kita lihat di serata negara Asia dan Asia Timur, kita akan mendapati kaum India tidak akan diterima di Ceylon dan juga tidak diterima di Burma. Sama halnya dengan kaum Cina, mereka tidak diterima di Thailand, Vietnam, Kemboja dan di negara-negara lain. Apakah bantuan berhubung kewarganegaraan yang mereka peroleh di semua wilayah tersebut?

"Di Burma, seperti yang kita semua sedia maklum, kaum India telah diusir keluar, di Ceylon mereka tidak diberikan taraf warganegara seperti juga di Burma. Saya tahu dan anda juga tahu. Apa yang sedang berlaku di Malaya? Di sini kita mendapati pemimpin Melayu berkata, ''Kita akan menerima mereka sebagai saudara, kita akan berikan mereka sepenuh peluang untuk meneruskan kehidupan di negara ini, kita akan beri mereka peluang untuk menjadi warganegara''. Seterusnya pada tahun 1957, dengan tidak mengambil kira kebolehan berbahasa (Melayu) ribuan orang India, Cina dan Ceylon menjadi warganegara. Seperti yang saya nyatakan, saya amat bernasib baik kerana dilahirkan di negara ini. Di manakah anda boleh berjumpa bangsa yang lebih prihatin, bersopan-santun dan tertib selain daripada bangsa Melayu. Di manakah anda boleh mendapat layanan politik yang baik untuk kaum pendatang? Di manakah dalam sejarah dunia? Saya bertanya kepada anda. Ini adalah fakta. Siapakah anda untuk menjaga keselamatan kami? Saya adalah kalangan 10 peratus kaum minoriti di sini. Tetapi saya amat gembira di sini.''

Persoalannya, kini apakah pengorbanan Melayu dikhianati oleh kaum lain?

-Awang Selamat

Komen aku

Sejarah ini PATUT disumbat dalam kepala hotak seluruh rakyat Malaysia.

NGO Melayu mesti bebas dari rasuah dan segala macam bentuk pengabdian yang menjurus kepada tindakan lembu cucuk hidung.

NGO Melayu seterusnya perlu mendesak agar kalangan menteri Melayu juga mesti bebas dari sifat jijik tersebut agar mereka tak terikat kepada mana mana tokey penarik lembu.

Monday, November 16, 2009

Penasihat ekonomi dengan gaji RM1 sebulan

Hadoi ....

Lama aku menyepi sebab tak ada apa apa yang nak aku katakan. Namun hari ini aku memang tergelak tahap gaban. Nak pecah perut aku dibuatnya. Dulu aku ada kata, biarlah yang ahli bicara tentang keahliannya.

Biarlah doktor gigi yang merawat gigi, pakar jantung bedah jantung, pakar ekonomi menjaga ekonomi, sarjana Melayu jagalah bahasa Melayu. Jika tidak maka rosaklah gigi, punahlah jantung, leburlah ekonomi dan hilanglah bahasa.

Inikah yang dikatakan bahawa jika suatu bangsa itu hendak dimusnahkan, maka dihantar pemimpin yang rosak?

Sudah sudah lah menjadi toya saudara ku sekalian. Taraf kita ditinggikan dengan aqal yang Allah sediakan. Jangan kita hinakan diri kita dengan menekan nikmat aqal yang dikurniakan Allah swt tersebut.

Friday, October 9, 2009


Photo menceritakan seribu kejadian. Begitulah hakikatnya. Bila kita melihat photo, terkadang kita geli, terkadang kita geram, dan paling banyak kita berburuk sangka. Maknanya terkadang kita tertipu dengan sekelumit kecil dari bahagian photo yang di'crop' dari photo yang lebih besar

Tapi ada kalanya, memang tujuan photo tersebut diambil mahu memperlihatkan kepada dunia bahawa beliau sedang memperjuangkan sesuatu. Wah hebat tu.

Dalam banyak banyak kejadian yang aku lihat dari foto tersebut, ada satu yang menarik perhatian aku. Gambar tersebut ada dalam banyak blog terkini

Dua orang yang mungkin mengaku beragama Islam, mungkin juga mereka berkata dalam hati mereka bahawa merekalah orang Islam yang paling Islam yang hidup dalam dunia ketika ini, malah mereka juga mungkin mengatakan bahawa selain dari mereka paling Islam, mereka juga adalah pejuang anti bangsa seluruh dunia, hanya mengutamakan Islam.

Mengapa aku berkata sedemikian, kerana dalam foto mereka yang gah tersebut, aku melihat, seorang lelaki, berserban (kira Islam lah tu) yang agak moden (sebab guna kaca mata hitam, hi hi hi GLAMER), serta pakaian sukan (t-shirt dan track bottom). Sedangkan perempuan Islam tersebut mengenakan tudung labuh hingga ke pinggang (kira alim lah, tapi jangan salah tafsir tentang alim, kerana alim itu penuh ilmu di dada)

Aku juga boleh menafsirkan (ikut suka aku lah) mereka juga ingin menunjukkan bahawa si lelaki tersebut mampu menjadi pemimpin kepada perempuan (aku anggap isteri dia sebab dia rangkul bahu perempuan tersebut menurutnya memperjuangkan suatu yang besar).

Dia (lelaki) memegang poster Teoh Beng Hock ! ! ! Ha ha ha tergelak aku. Perjuangan Islam apakah ini?

Aku anggap mereka ni Melayu lah. Yang menyebabkan aku tergelak, disebabkan, Melayu ini (mungkin lebih baik aku tak guna Melayu kerana aku rasa mereka tak suka digelar Melayu), Islam 'jenis' ini, sedang memperjuangkan suatu yang tiada tujuan. Atau pon tujuan dia bercelaru. Perjuangkanlah rawatan dialisis di mesjid untuk orang Islam ke, gabungan klinik pergigian swasta Islam seluruh negara yang memberikan rawatan percuma kepada orang Islam lanjut usia ke, something like that.

Masa aku zaman kanak kanak dulu, aku takut mendekati seorang abang ni. Sebab yang keluar dari mulut dia hanyalah sumpah seranah kepada perti pemerintah. Dia ingin aku ikut kata dia sama sama menurut fahaman parti dia. Banyangkan, nak suruh aku yang hanya suka main rounders, teng teng, guli, gelang getah dan sebagainya, agar sama sama ikut mengutuk kerajaan ! ! !

Walaupon aku masih kecil, dalam hati aku, dah tersemat aku nak jadi doktor kelak. Bila aku lihat dia, aku kira minda dia memang tak boleh jadi doktor punya. Apa taknya, dia hanya bekerja sebagai pengutuk kerajaan. Pagi tido, petang duduk di kedai minum kopi. Masih bujang (tua) dan tinggal bersama ibubapanya. Kalau ada orang lain pendapat dengan pendapat dia, dia akan gaduh. Mata merah, kira garang lah tu. Jangan main main ! ! !

Hari ini, aku lihat minda puak puak ini tak banyak berubah. Dari dulu hampir sama sahaja. Aku tau ramai kawan aku, doktor juga yang berjuang bersama puak puak ini, cuma bila soal politik, aku seolah bukan kawan lagi. Jadi kalau nak kawan, bicara sahaja soal kereta ke, kamera ke, kerja ke.

Bagi aku, tak kisah engkau nak politik kat mana. Tapi duduk satu meja. Bagi idea terbaik, naikkan Islam. BUKAN KERANA NAMA.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Biar pakar menerangkan tentang bidang kepakarannya

Ramai orang kat dalam dunia ni tau dah, saat dia mula mula lagi beli kereta, bahawa kereta yang dia beli itu mesti di servis. Percaya sahaja bahawa kereta yang dia beli itu mesti diservis adalah tak cukup melainkan dia mesti turuti kepercayaan dia dengan menghantar kereta dia itu ke pusat servis untuk diservis. Jika tidak, maka termasuklah dia dalam golongan bodoh. Percaya tapi tak laksanakan. Tak servis tapi berharap kereta dia akan baik hingga 99 tahun

Bukan itu sahaja, dia mestilah juga pandai memilih tempat servis kereta. Jika dia menghantar keretanya untuk diservis di kedai servis motor, maka dia termasuk pula ke dalam golongan bodoh bertingkat dua. Patutnya dia mestilah menghantar keretanya ke tempat servis yang memiliki kepakaran tentang kereta yag dia beli tersebut

Malah lebih bodoh lagi, jika dia arahkan mekanik supaya menggantikan minyak hitam yang dituang kedalam engin itu dengan air laut.

Lebih parah lagi, jika dia juga mahu orang ramai mempercayainya dengan mengatakan bahawa sepatutnya kereta orang lain juga harus menggantikan minyak hitam dengan air laut tanpa mengendahkan peraturan yang dikeluarkan oleh pereka kereta tersebut. Maka pengikut pengikutnya yang percaya kepada saranan dia ini, bertaraf lebih bodoh lah dari dia

Cerita di atas ini sungguh mudah untuk difahami. Namun cerita berikutnya di bawah ini akan memiliki nilai double standard. Pada hal sama sahaja

Semua manusia percaya bahawa dunia ini hanya sebesar biji pasir di padang pasir dalam galaksi bimasakti. Salah satunya boleh dirujuk di sini. Malah galaksi bima sakti juga hanyalah sebesar biji pasir dalam galaksi galaksi yang lain. Jadi manusia ini sebenarnya tak ada ertinya sama sekali di sisi Penciptanya.

Namun kita rasa bahawa kita ini dah besar sangat. Hingga kita rasa bahawa sang Pencipta kita itu bodoh dalam mencatur perjalanan hidup kita.

Kalau orang Islam komen mengenai Islam, mungkin dia ada sumber sedikit dari pengetahuannya. Namun, jika bukan Islam yang komen tentang Islam, maka jadilah dia (orang bukan Islam itu) seperti orang bodoh yang mahu orang lain percaya bahawa air laut boleh menggantikan minyak hitam dalam engin kereta.

Oleh itu, tak usahlah engkau (orang Islam yang bukan pakar tentang Islam, dan bukan Islam) nak komen mengenai perintah Allah dan Rasulullah saw sebagaimana termaktub dalam Al Quran dan Hadis.


Friday, October 2, 2009


Kepada anonymous yang memohon maaf kepada aku atas komen rendah akhlak tersebut, aku maafkan.

Aku harap lepas ni, kau dah insaf. Dan jadi dewasa ye. Ek ek ek ek ! ! ! Tapi jangan lah takut nak komen kat aku lagi.

Cuma komen kau aku tak padam. Ia mempunyai nilai sebagai bukti.

Daaaaa ! ! !

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Double standard

Kepada para Melayu sekalian, ketahuilah bahawa wujudnya blog aku ini bukan bermakna bahawa aku benci Melayu. Bukan juga aku lebih mementingkan Melayu dari Islam.

Melayu dan Islam adalah berbeza. Melayu adalah bangsa dan Islam adalah Agama, pegangan hidup, pedoman, dan cara hidup yang telah lengkap.

Bangsa terbatas pada negara, sedangkan Islam tiada terbatas kepada sempadan. Umpama rumah dan tempat kerja. Rumah kita adalah hak milik kita. Tak semua orang boleh masuk rumah kita. Fitrah manusia. Kita tak suka orang sesuka hati menceroboh rumah kita. Namanya rumah, nak rumah banglo ke, rumah teres ke, town house ke, apartment ke, flat mahupon setinggan, terserah pilihan kita. Semua orang bebas memilih.

Begitu juga Melayu, ada Melayu ultra, Melayu super, Melayu baru, Melayu lama, Melayu totok, dan apa sahaja nama boleh digunakan untuk menggambarkan keadaan dan sifat yang dimiliki

Tempat kerja kita pula adalah milik semua pekerja yang bekerja di situ. Kita tetap akan pertahankan tempat kerja kita sebagaimana kita pertahankan rumah kita, cuma kita tak heran berkongsi tempat kerja dengan pekerja lain malah kita juga menerima semua orang yang datang berkunjung ke tempat kerja kita.

Tempat kerja ini ada satu nama yang dikongsi bersama. Ia membawa pekerja ke satu destinasi yang mesti dipatuhi setiap pekerja. Jika tak setuju, cari lah kerja lain.

Perlu diingatkan, Islam itu hanya satu. TIADA TUHAN YANG DISEMBAH MELAINKAN ALLAH DAN NABI MUHAMMAD ITU PESURUH ALLAH. Ia bertujuan membawa umatnya kepada keredhaan Allah swt. Maka tiadalah Islam UMNO, Islam PAS, Islam kuno, Islam moden, Islam Liberal, Moderat, Inklusif, Ekslusif dan sebagainya.

Kemana mana kita pergi dalam dunia ini, kita adalah bersaudara dalam Islam. Namun tempat kita balik dan berteduh adalah ke rumah kita. Sebab itu mempertahankan rumah adalah tanggungjawab kita. Malaysia adalah rumah kita. Jangan abaikannya, bila rumah dah tergadai, kita akan turut mengadaikan keluarga kita juga.

Mengatakan bahawa kita tak perlu pertahankan Melayu tapi hanya perlu pertahankan Islam samalah mengatakan kita tak perlu pertahankan rumah dan seisi rumah kita (termasuk isteri dan anak anak kita) tapi hanya perlu pertahankan tempat kerja kita tentulah suatu pemikiran yang songsang dengan fitrah manusia. Malah binatang pon pertahankan hak mereka kecuali binatang yang bernama babi.

Memperthankan Islam adalah hak semua umat Islam, tapi mempertahankan bangsa adalah hak bangsa tersebut. Aku tak marah Cina pertahankan bangsa mereka sebab itu hak mereka, begitu juga aku tak halang India pertahankan hak mereka, namun mereka juga kena reti bahasa, bahawa Melayu juga berhak pertahankan hak mereka sebagaimana mereka pertahankan hak mereka.

Janganlah kata, hak aku minum arak, jadi aku kena minum arak walau di mana sahaja, walaupon di tempat bangsa Melayu yang beragama Islam yang tidak minum arak. Jika kau nak hak engkau dipertahankan, maka engaku juga kenalah pertahankan hak orang lain. Nak jadi bodoh itu boleh, tapi jangan jadi terlalu bodoh dan bengap.

Setahun yang lalu, aku telah menulis di blog dentistandme, mengenai hak Islam yang semakin hilang di Malaya, sila rujuk kembali di sini

Kalau nak kata racist, bukan aku sorang yang racist, mereka yang menuduh aku racist lebih racist dari aku. Cermin diri sendiri dulu baru tuding jari kepada orang lain.